Peer-reviewed · Open Access · Turkish / English · Quarterly

Home/Volume 4 · Issue 2/Review Article
Review Article

Promoting a New Path of Economic Policy for Regional Cooperation in the Middle East

Abstract

From the dissolution of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) to the current war between Russia and North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) countries in Ukraine, international polarization and the struggles of influence between world powers towards the Middle East region have not been as intense as we see today. This article seeks to answer the following question: how can major Eurasian powers such as Iran, Syria, Turkey, and Russia build a long-term collaboration that could also engage the Gulf countries? Much of the attention regarding regional relations has focused on energy projects, from the Arab Gulf to the Mediterranean on the one hand and from the Russian Federation via the Turkish mainland on the other, as an international supply towards Europe and the Americas. Effective and long-term collaboration requires not only the leading role of major Eurasian powers but also a due appreciation of the importance of strategic commodities other than energy products and a stronger awareness of the common challenges these powers share. This calls for a new economic model based on state-led investments, production, and employment in the space of the “Five Seas”, whose prerequisite is respect for international law within the framework of the legitimacy of the United Nations to ensure stability and prevent the resurgence of extremism, facilitate the return of displaced persons, and encourage reconstruction and peace efforts throughout the region. Syria, which had previously promoted the “Five Seas approach” with Turkey as a driving force, as well as the other countries of the Levant (Lebanon, Jordan with Iraq), the Arab countries of the Gulf and North Africa, have the opportunity to take advantage of the change in the global context of world politics. They will assume a key role with Russia, China, India and other emerging countries in the multipolarization of world politics to bring into use the advantage of the region’s geographical position at the hub of energy supply, infrastructure investment, transport and international trade.

Full Text

The Middle East Region in the Global Union (1988-1991). In reality, the United States

Context has lost a historic opportunity to lead the world

or at least to improve world peace and stability.

THE CONFRONTATION BETWEEN RUSSIA Instead, American leaders have imposed their

and the West has had profound consequences dictates on many countries through invasions,

for the economy and politics of Middle Eastern sanctions and the use of the “soft war” (Motaghi

countries, including the impacts of the war & Mahboobeh, 2012). Subsequently, the US

on their food security, energy prices and invasion of Afghanistan (2001) and Iraq (2003),

labor markets, especially for countries that the so-called Arab Spring (2010), international

experienced the so-called “Arab Spring”. polarization, and the struggles of influence

After the 1990s, we witnessed an among world powers towards the Middle East

unprecedented victory for capitalism, have gravely disturbed global stability, peace,

particularly with the West dismantling the Soviet and prosperity (Gürcan, 2019bGürcan (2019c). The source article does not provide a separate full bibliographic entry for this citation., 2020Gürcan (2020). The source article does not provide a separate full bibliographic entry for this citation., 2022).

Indeed, geopolitically, the region’s potential began during the 1990s with the emergence

of at least 650 million consumers, energy of new growth centers and the formation of

wealth that amounts to 66% of proven a multipolar global economic system as the

global oil reserves, and strategic position as weight of players in emerging markets increased

a transit corridor between the East (and its (Abdullah, 2019Abdullah (2019). The source article does not provide a separate full bibliographic entry for this citation.). In this process, however,

ascending path: China, India, and Russia) oil and gas have remained two strategic

and the West, and between the North and the commodities despite all efforts to develop a

South, shows the importance of the current stronger potential for renewable energy (The

realignments in the status of the countries of World Economic Forum, 2017).

the region (with their different geostrategic Since the late 1980s, the US has sought to

and geoeconomic weights). China, Russia, impose a new global pattern as the sole global

India, Pakistan, Türkiye, Iran, Arab countries, pole by direct military interventions or later

African countries, and Europe itself can secure by promoting the different components of soft

real independence only by way of creating a power, such as using sanctions and the media.

geopolitical Eurasian alliance (Abbas, 2022Abbas (2022). The source article does not provide a separate full bibliographic entry for this citation.), In the meantime, the BRICS, as the first non-

a multipolar alliance (Dugin, 2020Dugin (2020). The source article does not provide a separate full bibliographic entry for this citation.), or “post- regional alliance not based on a single culture,

hegemonic multipolarity” (Gürcan, 2020Gürcan (2020). The source article does not provide a separate full bibliographic entry for this citation.). In has strongly reasserted its demand for a “fair

reality, a better understanding of the potential international order”. With this understanding,

for better alliances and improved cooperation it has established an investment bank and

requires identifying the dynamic developments continues to strive to get out of the hegemony

that took place after the triumph of capitalism of the dollar (Gürcan, 2019aGürcan (2019c). The source article does not provide a separate full bibliographic entry for this citation., 2019bGürcan (2019c). The source article does not provide a separate full bibliographic entry for this citation., 2022).

in its American form since the 1990s (The week In this environment, emerging countries

UK, 2023). are increasingly favoring international trade

based on national currencies and preferential exchanges (such as supplying fuel to China and

Emerging countries are India at a reduced price) in their international

increasingly favoring trade relations.

These global developments aside, the Middle international trade based East has remained a highly volatile region.

on national currencies and Since 2010, the collapse of the peace process

preferential exchanges in their in the Middle East with Israeli intransigence in

international trade relations. compliance with United Nations resolutions,

the escalation of instability in the region and

In examining the increasing weight of its multiple challenges, including the collapse

new economic poles and emerging countries of the concept of collective security, especially

globally, one could easily notice that a power with the so-called Arab Spring have revealed the

shift has occurred from the West to the East fragility of the status quo (Sun & Zhang, 2022Sun & Zhang (2022). The source article does not provide a separate full bibliographic entry for this citation.).

and from the North to the South. This process Moreover, the course of the war in Ukraine

MENA (Middle East-North Africa) and the Five Seas. (BRIQ , 2023BRIQ (2023). The source article does not provide a separate full bibliographic entry for this citation.)

showed the fragility of the global energy system whose prerequisite is respect for international

and the failure of Western policies in relying law within the framework of the legitimacy

on alternative sources. It led to Russia and the of the United Nations to ensure stability and

OPEC countries returning to the forefront, prevent the resurgence of extremism, facilitate

resulting in new positions and alliances. the return of displaced persons, and encourage

Taking account of the challenges mentioned reconstruction and peace efforts throughout

above, this article seeks to answer the the region. Syria, which had previously

following question: how can major Eurasian promoted the “Five Seas approach” with

powers such as Iran, Syria, Türkiye, and Russia Türkiye as a driving force, as well as the other

build a long-term collaboration that could countries of the Levant (Lebanon, Jordan with

also engage the Gulf countries? Effective and Iraq), the Arab countries of the Gulf and North

long-term collaboration requires not only the Africa, have the opportunity to take advantage

leading role of major Eurasian powers but of the change in the global context of world

also a due appreciation of the importance politics and will assume a key role with Russia,

of strategic commodities other than energy China, India and other emerging countries

products and a stronger awareness of the in the multipolarization of world politics to

common challenges these powers share. bring into use the advantage of the region’s

This calls for a new economic model based geographical position at the hub of energy

on state-led investments, production, and supply, infrastructure investment, transport

employment in the space of the “Five Seas”, and international trade.

The Middle East at the Crossroads and regional benefits. Moreover, the evolution of

economic governance, external pressures, or the

The Middle East seeks a peaceful path, economically use of sanctions testify to an increasingly aggressive

and politically, to overcome instability, despite the use of the economy in interstate relations, showing

specificities of each country and its place in the the intrinsic fragility of the rentier model and the

world. The region is currently undergoing structural impasse in the mobilization of wealth to ensure

changes. The regional order is in transition amidst a conservative economy. From a macroeconomic

weakening governance in certain countries and point of view, despite the recent rise in hydrocarbon

growing power rivalries against the backdrop of prices which has benefited the Gulf countries (Fitch

American withdrawal despite the continuation of Solutions, 2022), it could be argued that the human

Western interventionism through a combination of and economic security of the Middle Eastern and

different methods of soft power (sanctions, pressure, North African countries has deteriorated. A possible

and media manipulation of public opinion). risk of protests in North Africa and the Levant

This new race for regional hegemony led by the cannot be excluded due to the galloping prices of

Americans or its proxies calls into question the many strategic and supplied goods (produced by

traditional hierarchy of power and the internal path these states or imported), increasing the risks to

of economic development, which is based, above all, macroeconomic stability in the MENA region (IMF,

on the internal capacity of each country in the region. 2022).

Indeed, all countries in the Middle East suffer from a failure to reform and open up their economies

Many Middle Eastern states persist and mobilize all potential internal forces, including

the private sector, as well as demographic pressures in their political and ideological and acute problems in coping with an explosion of

biases when conducting their youth. Social tensions can become highly disruptive

foreign policy without considering mass protests in parts of the Middle East. Admittedly,

their national interests and a distinction must be made between countries

regional benefits. at high risk of social unrest, whose economic

situation is difficult and exacerbated by conflict,

The economy, which guarantees sociopolitical countries at moderate risk of social unrest, which

stability through the generalized effects of oil, gas may again experience social grievances motivated

and other raw material and rents or indirect rents by poor socioeconomic conditions, including high

(for example, tourism, transit and remittances from unemployment and inflation, and finally, moderate

workers abroad), has become a prominent political risk countries that are well equipped financially

means in the relations between regional countries to mitigate socioeconomic pressures (Economist

and its external “relations” with the international Intelligence Uni, 2022; World Bank, 2022). The overall

powers. macroeconomic indicators are uncertain because

Many Middle Eastern states persist in their political they depend on direct oil and other energy sources

and ideological biases when conducting their foreign and rents, given rising inflation and unemployment,

policy without considering their national interests diminishing capitalistic assets, raised financial

Protests flared up in Lebanon due to the economic crisis. (CGTN, 2020CGTN (2020). The source article does not provide a separate full bibliographic entry for this citation.)

sector vulnerabilities, and patchy implementation of regional welfare, as it fuels economic rivalries

corrective policy actions. Instead of seeking a self- and a climate of instability at the expense of

reliant development model and regional cooperation international cooperation. Unlike economic

with mutual benefits, some of these countries tend to liberalism in the form of acute capitalism

align with the “collective western approach”, which or rentier conservatism, a model of internal

only perpetuates regional problems, failing to face up development and regional integration (in terms

to common challenges (Cordesman, 2020Cordesman (2020). The source article does not provide a separate full bibliographic entry for this citation.). of pan-state infrastructures, trade, investment,

transport, telecom networking, and tourism)

Beyond International and Regional remains the best way to achieve peace and a

Polarizations: Tensions between Powers as sustainable state of balance. Scholars studying

an Obstacle to the Economy the Middle East often underestimate the scope

of economic determinants in the emergence and

On behalf of their interests, Western states management of these same crises (Schmid &

put diverse economic strategies into practice Benbernou, 2020). The political economy of the

by pursuing an exclusionary economic Middle East is more interesting as an element of

development discourse. However, this leads understanding the evolutions and the relations

to regional tensions rather than improves between states.

The fragility of economies linked to commodity European powers. For the past three decades, the

prices, sensitive to geopolitical shocks, and collective West saw the region as an arena and

dependent on the choices of industrialized dividing line to prevent the success of multipolarity.

economies has shattered the enchanted dream of Indeed, American leaders and many European

paid idleness. Financial and social difficulties are leaders, who see themselves as representing the

accumulating, causing major instability, both for “international community”, constantly declare the

the rentier states and those who have benefited importance of confronting the continuous rise

directly or indirectly from their generosity. One of emerging poles in the face of global initiatives

thing leading to another, most of the major such as China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI),

geopolitical developments that have recently Russia’s efforts at developing the BRICS group,

upset the region, from the contagion of the “Arab and breaking out of dollar hegemony, via India

Spring” to the inevitable rise in tensions between and other emerging countries.

the great powers, can be analyzed through the Today, the countries in the region with the

prism of the economy. largest land and maritime surfaces and those

If the “obsession with power” that accompanies endowed with hydrocarbon resources retain

the birth of the modern international system a decisive advantage; their territories must

is crystallizing today in a spectacular way in also be the subject of strategic investments

the Middle East, it is in particular because the (in infrastructure, transport, and economic

rivalry of external actors opens up the field of development) to enhance this possible positioning

competition. The policy of Western hegemony advantage. The development of infrastructure,

has continued to contribute to modulating the particularly ports and airports, can be part of

national governance of the states of the Middle a rational strategy for a large regional hub, a

East according to the desires of this collective platform and route for airport transport, energy

West (even if it is not totally homogeneous). supply, telecommunications, and transit as a

Obviously, it has been done without diminishing crossroads between Europe, Asia, and Africa.

the opportunity for some regional states to Furthermore, the regional demographics are on

assume regional leadership, concerned about the cusp of a new age for economic development.

their corporate interests, through mobilizing If we look at growth models, two different models

enormous resources to serve an external objective roughly coexist in the region: that of truly rentier

to the detriment of the preservation of regional countries, exporters of energy, raw materials

economic and social order. Each tries to capture a like the Gulf countries, or dependent on rent

share of the regional influence market, increasing (transit, tourism and expatriate flows), and that

the antagonism between states. of countries whose economy is rather productive:

The Middle East, as a bridge, occupies a such as Iran, Türkiye, which is integrated into the

strategic place in the world, connecting India to global production chain, or Syria, before the war

the Mediterranean, stretching to the Red Sea, the orchestrated by a coalition of “collective west”,

Indian Ocean, and the Caspian Sea. This location which produced diversified goods. Between these

has always become a destination for colonial or two models, Jordan and Lebanon are importing

post-colonial rivalries between American and countries, dependent on aid and subsidies from

Chinese Ambassador to Jordan, Chen Chuandong, speaks in Amman on the 45th anniversary of diplomatic relations between China and Jordan. (Jordan Chinese Embassy, 2022Jordan Chinese Embassy (2022). The source article does not provide a separate full bibliographic entry for this citation.) ​​

their neighbors and allies. But all depend on the many states of the region, perceived as aggressive

evolution of international markets, through the at the approach of this collective west.

price of crude and raw materials and the dollar The Middle East’s economic system has long

exchange rate, and have less and less control over been considered on the fringes of globalization.

these elements. This explains why these states The rise in importance of economic factors in the

have concluded free trade agreements with several competition of powers in the Middle East and

partners and the main financiers of the emerging using economic tools in the race for domination

world and have approached Russia via the OPEC+ does not automatically lead to a sustainable

cooperation or China and India. The subsequent economic development model. The thwarted

Western presence in Afghanistan and Iraq did economic power means that the local actors

not assist, and the inability to stabilize the area ultimately have little control over the regional

resulted in an unclear outcome. The struggle was economic system, the growth trajectories are

engendered by the process of polarization, which disrupted by internal and external factors, and

then took the shape of aroused ambitions. The the persistence of very high conflict thwarts

great powers measured the weight of their means economic logic. The economy finally appears

to influence the establishment of a new balance as a rather poor ally in the context of growing

or at least exercise sufficient deterrence vis-à-vis polarization.

The structure of rentier economies, which is and economically counterproductive.

poorly diversified, also leads to dependence Ultimately, US sanctions could also increase

on external products and know-how. the participation of Russia and China in

Worse still, the dependence on the price development, geopolitical reconfiguration and

of hydrocarbons is extreme. The revenues reconstruction projects in countries affected

garnered depend on the choices of the other by wars. We do not know how long it may

major producers, such as the United States take for a new configuration of equilibrium

and Russia, and the maintenance of demand to emerge because, amid internationalist

from the major customers, such as China one-upmanship, no hegemon or disciplining

or India. These games of interdependence power seems able to prevail. The United States

intersect with the question of alliances and has long assumed this responsibility on the

allegiances. The socioeconomic challenges, political and military level but now wishes to

entry into the digital age, and climate change multiply the pressures of all kinds, including

will inevitably force them to a radical change soft power. The intervention of an external

in economic functioning. The water resource, hegemon could never once be decisive. It

rare and coveted, is at the heart of increasingly remains ambiguous whether the decision-

significant geopolitical tensions, social makers of the Middle Eastern states will

inequality, delay in reforms and a conciliatory still be able to define the rules of a virtuous

reflex. economic game in the region or whether

China, Russia and other emerging countries will play this role in the future.

US sanctions could also increase The conviction is increasing among many

the participation of Russia and world countries that transformation and

prosperity are not exclusive to the Western China in development, geopolitical powers and cannot come through oil rents,

reconfiguration and reconstruction as there is a margin for adopting a self-

projects in countries affected by wars. propelled development model that considers

the structural transformations in the world economy. The powerful countries friendly to

Economic considerations like rapproche- Syria, specifically Russia, Iran and China, have

ment and regional cooperation can dictate prevented the hegemonic powers, mainly the

major political choices. Both the relations United States and its regional proxies, from

between Türkiye and Iran and the rest of the disintegrating Syria's geostrategic space and

states of the Arabian Peninsula or other count- territory. Characterized by its proximity to

ries of the Middle East region can lead to ex- Türkiye at the crossroads of three continents

haustion or support of economic cooperation (Europe, Africa and Asia), Syria, with Iraq

projects to face these multiple challenges in and Iran, seeks to regain its independence

societies. The effect of sanctions is difficult to as long as everyone acts on international

assess precisely, but the tool can be politically charters.

North-South Transport Corridor (INSTC). (BRIQ , 2023)

Relations with China, Russia and Türkiye progress. That experience will be invaluable

in Syria. Syria’s participation in the BRI would

Syria is now shifting to the East, towards create a new corridor across the Middle East

China and Russia, although it remains a linking Iran to Syria via Iraq and benefit all

Mediterranean country with a key seaport regional states. Beijing and Moscow have

at Latakia. However, this does not mean that been able to build a bridge between Iran and

China, Russia, and regional players are all Iraq by developing cross-border rail with Iran

behaving according to a single, concerted at the border crossing point between the two

strategy (Dorsey, 2020Dorsey (2020). The source article does not provide a separate full bibliographic entry for this citation.). While both may countries on the Basra/Shalamcheh corridor,

be driven in part by a common goal, which itself leads to the ports in the south

their strategies diverge in some respects. of Iran on the Arabian Gulf and connects

Despite their shared desire to promote to the International North-South Transport

multilateralism, their priority to pursue their Corridor (INSTC) (Silk Road Briefing,

own interests shapes their actions. 2020). This multimodal route feeds east to

China has actively participated in Iraq’s India’s west coast ports, north to the Caspian

economic reconstruction, with bilateral, Sea, and to Azerbaijan and Russia, with a

practical cooperation making steady northeast branch leading to Afghanistan.

China aspires to enlarge and strengthen has, in recent years, played the role of both

its presence in the Middle East because mediator and negotiator in the internal

of its strategic geographical importance, political process that the UN sponsors.

large economic market and wealth of The Russian facilitation, which Moscow is

natural resources that China needs. Sino- currently offering, aims to persuade Syria

Syrian relations are projected to grow in and Türkiye to engage in talks to arrive at a

the foreseeable future due to the strategic security settlement framework and ease any

political understanding between the two regional tensions. The questions in play are

countries and Syria’s active presence under enormous and are not limited to the region’s

the BRI, which enhances its geographical borders. The Russian military presence in

position in the Eastern Mediterranean Syria, overlooking the Mediterranean Sea,

(Zreik & Zhao, 2022Zreik & Zhao (2022). The source article does not provide a separate full bibliographic entry for this citation.). is often mentioned, which is highly strategic

at the regional and global levels due to its geographical position. Nevertheless, it should not neglect the gas exploration Syria and Turkey are called upon projects in the eastern Mediterranean, or to play an increasing role in even make Türkiye a gas supply hub for

their zone, located in the heart Europe, which allows Russia to increase its

of the Middle East. scope of action on the regional gas markets

and also allows it to exert influence outside the former Soviet Republics. In addition to

What is now more certain than before intensified cooperation with OPEC, Russia

is that Russia’s presence in Syria is not a aims to grow commercial markets directly

mere strategic interest for Moscow but or through the BRICS mechanism. This

an existential necessity. Russia’s military represents a break in Russia’s isolation from

presence in western Syria should be the “international community”.

considered in two contexts. The first Syria and Türkiye are called upon to

is the context of the Syrian war and its play an increasing role in their zone,

regional dimensions, and the second is located in the heart of the Middle East,

Syria’s position overlooking the eastern which is in direct contact with the region’s

Mediterranean Sea. countries and other regions. The region is

Moscow attaches major importance to the then faced with a major transformation

Middle East, which cannot be ignored. The of its political order, creating an unstable

Kremlin has become increasingly involved security environment that will put

in the Arab region. Russia’s strategy is additional pressure on the major powers

long-term repositioning and defending its and each country in the region. Ultimately,

national security with NATO extending its this ongoing transformation represents

borders and the West’s disrespect for the an opportunity for many countries in the

Minsk Agreement. In Syria, the Kremlin region to concretize the concept of the

Growing ties between China and the Arab world unlock unlimited possibilities for cooperation. One of the largest industrial zones in Egypt was established by Sino-Egyptian cooperation.(CGTN, 2022CGTN (2022). The source article does not provide a separate full bibliographic entry for this citation.)

five seas and actively engage in the future. to push Russia into the quagmire of

Türkiye’s leveraging role is decisive. It new battlefields. After the failure of the

can cooperate with Russia and China in policy of reorganizing societies under a

the reconstruction projects of Syria and paternalistic attitude, it seems that the

Iraq and, more generally, make regional United States, as a global pole, can only

cooperation succeed. Syria’s attractiveness use sanctions or other components of soft

lies within its “Five Seas” capability, a plan to power. In this environment, Syria, Iran,

link the Caspian, Black Sea, Mediterranean Iraq, Lebanon, Russia, Türkiye, China, and

Sea and Red Sea with the Persian Gulf. others can rebuild the Middle East using

the New Silk Road and the Five Seas. The

A New Path for the Middle Eastern Countries New Silk Road lies at the heart of China’s

strategy for the decades to come. This will

The US administration is making efforts also usher in a new era for the Middle East

to reorganize Middle East politics. This region, which has always been coveted for

time it is no longer to supply itself with its strategic position and wealth, disputed

oil for its economy but to contain China between the Eurasian and maritime

and exhaust the Russian forces by trying empires.

For the rest of the world, China’s peaceful should consider the possibility of restoring

development can be seen positively if Syria’s relations with Saudi Arabia (Kane

the BRI and the BRICS grouping pursue & Gassem, 2018) and Türkiye in favor of

win-win cooperation. The New Silk Road a more prosperous Middle East that could

envisions a “green belt” in this region. It overcome its instability (Aytekin, 2022Aytekin (2022). The source article does not provide a separate full bibliographic entry for this citation.).

seems that the Chinese dream is already Ironically, the Biden-led US is giving

underway. The five countries constituting up its role as the world leader and the

the core of the Middle East (Iran, Türkiye, champion of free trade and environmental

Iraq, Syria, and Lebanon) are also interested protection while China has taken over

in being part of the BRI. Particularly, the this role. Prolonged by relentlessness, the

BRI can help the rebuilding efforts for Syrian tragedy has dispelled the West’s

Syria’s devastated economy on a new basis, pretenses and exposed its most devious

shielding it from external threats. The strategies. But the worst of all has been to

BRI will provide Syria with a more stable whitewash terrorism on the part of Western

environment, with South-West Asia being states. The exclamation point is: How can

structured around two corridors (with we resist nausea in front of these politicians

major roles in particular for Iran, Iraq, who, with each attack on European soil, are

Syria, and Lebanon), whether it is the road poured out in indignant condemnations of

and rail corridor (going from Urumqi as terrorist violence they have fed and praised

the largest city in western China to coastal elsewhere? The war on Syria has been a

towns in the Middle East) or sea routes large-scale international conflict in which a

leading to the Mediterranean via Suez. rival coalition has formed. The distinctions

between “rebels”, “democrats”, “moderates”, “seculars”, “Islamists”, or “jihadists” are but

Despite its challenges and superficial divides promoted by Western

uncertainties, the Middle East powers and their allies. By now, everyone

can provide world politics with understands that the reality of the Syrian

conflict, for the past ten years, has been the great opportunities and insightful struggle between state-sponsored terrorist perspectives. conglomerates and a national army that defends its country against foreign invasion

Syria, despite of its economic weaknesses (Guigue, 2020Guigue (2020). The source article does not provide a separate full bibliographic entry for this citation.; Gürcan, 2019cGürcan (2019c). The source article does not provide a separate full bibliographic entry for this citation.). But it has

and the US's hostility, through its alliance also spread its miasma to the four corners

with Russia and Iran, has been able to of the globe, returning like a boomerang.

revive its political influence in recent Despite its challenges and uncertainties,

years. Syria faces an uphill struggle for its the Middle East can provide world politics

economic strategy, but as Iraq’s substantial with great opportunities and insightful

energy resources come into play, this will perspectives. At the same time, there are

enhance its vision (Raimbaud, 2017Raimbaud (2017). The source article does not provide a separate full bibliographic entry for this citation.). One very positive developments led by China

and the BRICS countries. It is very difficult led to more fragmentation and the absence

to envisage the course of the current of collective security for the countries of the

tensions. One thing is sure, though: shared region. It is important here to emphasize

development is the only way to bring that it would not be kept captive to the

peace to the Middle East, and a lasting old methods of analysis and the mentality

solution can only be reached through the of American hegemony or the collective

concept of Peace Through Development west in general (Barnes & Lovatt, 2022Barnes & Lovatt (2022). The source article does not provide a separate full bibliographic entry for this citation.),

. In these wasted decades before and after especially since many countries, as a result

the “Arab spring” and multiple tensions of the experiences gained, have begun to

and wars, the Collective Western behavior emerge from this “cloak” in light of the

towards several regions has been botched emerging global changes (Culbreath, 2023Culbreath (2023). The source article does not provide a separate full bibliographic entry for this citation.).

to ensure regional security and peace. Syria does not think of revenge, nor is it

If the West desires a more peaceful and driven by emotions and passions. On the

democratic Middle East, it should develop contrary, instability benefits the external

friendly relations with the people and their forces interfering in the region’s affairs for

legitimate representatives so that the West their own interests. Thereby, it is certain

can well join the reconstruction efforts that solving the current regional slump and

in the region and the promotion of world finding peace (which requires many painful

peace. concessions) will guarantee the collective

security and interests of the peoples of the

The Needed Perspectives regional countries. The cost of peace and

common challenges remains lower than

The ideological struggle for control is not that of continuing conflicts with human

productive for any of the countries in the losses and more internal problems at each

region. Furthermore, historical lessons country’s level.

since the Sykes-Picot Agreement show that

reliance on major powers or contradictions Conclusion

of interests among them only achieves

temporary “gains”, especially when the For the rest of the world, including Middle

cultural diversity that characterizes these East countries, China’s peaceful development

countries is a tool of intervention that can can be seen in a positive light as long as the

be exploited for further division, rather BRI and the BRICS pursue win-win coope-

than being a source of wealth, and an ration. Moreover, the “bone-breaking” battle

impetus for their constructive cooperation. between the Russian Federation, which de-

Besides human losses or wounds, spending fends its national security, and NATO, which

billions in absurd wars, which continued to is fueling the conflict, proves once again the

play some countries by proxy on behalf of importance of achieving world peace based

the “collective West” since the beginning of on legitimacy rather than imposing Western

what was called the Arab Spring, has only hegemony by various means (Chris, 2010Chris (2010). The source article does not provide a separate full bibliographic entry for this citation.).

The war in Ukraine is a blow to relations Notes

between Russia and the West, and this situation

will likely persist in the long term. However, its 1 Many Western thinkers agree on the growing

impacts on Middle East countries vary depen- concern about the strengthening of the alliance

ding on their natural wealth, including hydro- between the rising poles competing with the Uni-

carbons, their capacity to produce or import ted States, as the former US secretary of state and

goods, in particular food and raw materials, national security adviser Henry Kissinger said:

and their development trajectory. “‘We are now living in a totally new era”, transc-

Syria, a close ally of Russia, like Türkiye or other ript of a discussion between Henry Kissinger and

countries in the Middle East, is more than ever Edward Luce, which took place on May 7 in Was-

concerned about the evolution of the positions hington Financial Times US national editor, May

of the various world poles and the repositioning 9, 2022.

of international and regional powers in the 2 Without adopting all the views presented, it

whole region. Indeed, each regional country is possible to refer to the analysis of a number of

could assume a stabilizing role. A cessation writers affiliated with the Carnegie organization:

of ongoing extremism and violence, and Carnegie Endowment for International Peace:

eventual political reconciliation, including the What the Russian War in Ukraine Means for the

reintegration of vital state institutions, would Middle East. MARCH 24, 2022. Retried from ht-

improve the operational environment for tps://carnegieendowment.org/2022/03/24/what-

facilitating the reconstruction of the economy russian-war-in-ukraine-means-for-middle-east-

of regional states and the rebuilding of social pub-86711.

cohesion. This means that regional countries 3 As Mao Tse-Tung argues: "Therefore, to over-

could shift their alliances and move from the take the United States is not only possible, but ab-

current state of engagement into a forthcoming solutely necessary and obligatory. If we don't, the

state of partnership and cooperation. Building Chinese nation will be letting the nations of the

an economic model based on maximizing the world down and we will not be making much of a

gains of constructive cooperation and shared contribution to mankind” (Marxist, 2004Marxist (2004). The source article does not provide a separate full bibliographic entry for this citation.).

benefits in the space of five seas requires the ⁴ Effectively, shared development is the only

utmost importance to guarantee stability, way to bring peace to the Middle East, and a las-

reconstruction and peace throughout the ting solution can only be reached through the

region. The question for western states is concept of “Peace Th rough Development”, as the

whether their antagonistic approach toward German political activist Helga Zepp-LaRouc-

the region will achieve any long-term gains. he stresses: HARTMANN Alexander, The Peace

After decades of instability, it is time to adopt Dividend of the New Silk Road: Global Recons-

full engagement by all concerned parties on truction of the Physical Economy. Executive In-

an equal footing, which seems to be the best telligence Review, 13 November 2015. Retrieved

way to avoid wasting another decade to the from https://larouchepub.com/eiw/public/2015/

detriment of all. eirv42n45-20151113/05-07_4245.pdf.

References Culbreath, J. (2023, January 3). Rival Theories of Multi-

polarity: Alexander Dugin and Jiang Shigong. The European Conservative. https://europeanconservative. Abbas, S. R. (2022). Russia’s Eurasian Union Dream: A com/articles/essay/rival-theories-of-multipolarity-a- Way Forward Towards Multipolar World Order. Jourlexander-dugin-and-jiang-shigong/ nal of Global Faultlines, 9(1), 33-43. The week UK. (2023). Davos 2023 and the decline of Aytekin, E. (2022, December 8). China eyeing greater

globalisation. https://www.theweek.co.uk/business/

clout in Middle East as US shifts focus towards Asieconomy/959270/davos-2023-and-the-decline-of-gloa-Pacific. Anadolu Agency. https://www.aa.com.tr/ balisation en/politics/china-eyeing-greater-clout-in-middle-e- Djavadi, A. (2016, June 6). Türkiye’s Foreign Policy: From ast-as-us-shifts-focus-towards-asia-pacific/2759027# ‘Zero Problems’ To ‘Nothing But Problems’. Radio Free

Badran, T. (2010, June 29). A Syria in minor key. Founda- Europe Radio Liberty. https://www.rferl.org/a/tur-

tion for Defense of Democracies. https://www.fdd.org/ key-foreign-policy-erdogan-zero-problems/27781927.

analysis/2010/06/29/a- syria-in-minor-key/ html

Baldwin, D.A. (1999/2000, Winter). The sanctions debate Dorsey, J. M. (2020). Syria lures but will China bite? Gene-

and the logic of choice, International Security, 24(3), va Center for Security Policy.

80-107. Dugin, A. (2020). Russian strategist Dr. Alexander Dugin

Benbernou, A., & Schmid, D. (2020, March 23). Mo- “The Belt and Road Initiative: A Eurasian Road” (Fik-

yen-Orient : l’économie dans la course à la puissance. ret Akfırat, Interviewer). Belt & Road Initiative Quar-

IFRI. terly, 1(4), 6-18.

Barnes, J., & Lovatt, H. (2022, April 28). Principled prag- Economist Intelligence Unit. (2022). Middle East Outlook

matism: Europe's place in a multipolar Middle East. 2023: Weathering Political and Economic Headwinds.

European Council on Foreign Relations. https://ecfr. https://www.eiu.com/n/campaigns/middle-east-outlo-

eu/publication/principled-pragmatism-europes-pla- ok-2023/

ce-in-a-multipolar-middle-east/ Economist Intelligence Unit. (2023). Middle East outlook

Barnes, J. & Bowen, A. (2015). Rethinking U.S. strategy in 2023. https://www.eiu.com/n/campaigns/middle-e-

ast-outlook-2023/ the Middle East. Center for the National Interest Erdogan’s belligirent policies leave Türkiye more isolated Bassam, A. A., Malaz, M. M., & Ziad, A. A. (2019). Basthan ever. (2020, November 2). Lokmat Times. sam, A. A., Malaz, M. M., & Ziad, A. A. China: The Fitch Solutions. (2022) Fitch Solutions Middle East and Founding Act Of The Global Macro-Syste(m, The Tra- North Africa Key Themes For 2023. jectory and Limits of Ambitions. Ghatrouf, M. N. (2018, September 30). Le Moyen-O- Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. (2022, rient entre les options américaines et les décisions March 24). What the Russian War in Ukraine Merusses… Qui épuise l’autre ? Réseau International.

ans for the Middle East. https://carnegieendowment. https://reseauinternational.net/le-moyen-orient-ent-

org/2022/03/24/what-russian-war-in-ukraine-means- re-les-options-americaines-et-les-decisions-rus-

for-middle-east-pub-86711 ses-qui-epuise-lautre/?fbclid=IwAR008Vt4UeG-gy-

Cordesman, A. H. (2020, August 24). The Greater Midd- tWB1X7YcQRTmX_

le East: From the “Arab Spring” to the “Axis of Failed Guigue, B. (2020, October 22). Le théorème de Bachar

States”. Center for Strategic and International Studies. el-Assad, par Bruno Guigue. RT en français. https://

https://www.csis.org/analysis/greater-middle-east-ara- francais.rt.com/opinions/79937-theoreme-bac-

b-spring-axis-failed-states har-el-assad-par-bruno-guigue

Gürcan, Efe Can. (2019a). Building a Fair World Order in truit le Moyen-Orient. Institut Schiller. https://

a Post-American Age. Belt & Road Initiative Quarterly, www.institutschiller.org/notre-action/conferences/

1(1), 6-16. Les-Nouvelles-Routes-de-la-Soie-reussir-une-co-

Gürcan, Efe Can. (2019b). Multipolarization, South-South operation-gagnant-gagnant-avec-la/Syrie-Iran-Li-

Cooperation and the Rise of Post- ban-comment-la-Nouvelle-Route-de-la-soie-reconst-

Hegemonic Governance. New York: Routledge. ruit-le-Moyen

Gürcan, Efe Can. (2019c). Political geography of Türkiye’s Silk Road Briefing. (2022, January 16). Syria Joins China’s

intervention in Syria: underlying Belt And Road Initiative. https://www.silkroadbriefing.

causes and consequences (2011-2016). Journal of Aggres- com/news/2022/01/16/syria-joins-chinas-belt-and-ro-

sion, Conflict and Peace Research, ad-initiative/

11(1), 1–10. Sun D. & Zhang, J. (2022). China’s proposal for the Eastern

Gürcan, Efe Can. (2020). The Construction of “Post-He- Mediterranean conflict resolution: a “developmental

gemonic Multipolarity” in Eurasia: A peace”. BRIQ Belt & Road Initiative Quarterly, 4(1),

46(2-3), 127-151. THE USA AND THE NEW WORLD ORDER A Deba-

Gürcan, Efe Can. (2022). Imperialism after the Neoliberal te Between Olavo de Carvalho and Aleksandr Dugin.

International Monetary Fund (2022, October 13). Regio- PHILOSOPHY, GOVERNMENT, AND SOCIAL

nal Economic Outlook for the Middle East and Cent- THOUGHT.

ral Asia https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/REO/ The World Bank. (2022). A New State of Mind: Greater

MECA/Issues/2022/10/13/regional-economic-outlo- Transparency and Accountability in the Middle East

ok-mcd-october-2022 and North Africa. https://openknowledge.worldbank.

Kane, F., & Gassem, B. (2018, October 25). MBS: Middle org/bitstream/handle/10986/38065/English.pdf?sequ-

East can be the ‘new Europe’. Arab News. https://www. ence=5&isAllowed=y

arabnews.com/node/1393491/%7B%7B The World Economic Forum (2017, September 20). The

Luce, E. (2022, May 9). ‘We are now living in a totally new global economic balance of power is shifting. https://

era’ — Henry Kissinger. Financial Times. https://www. www.weforum.org/agenda/2017/09/the-global-econo-

ft.com/content/cd88912d-506a-41d4-b38f-0c37cb- mic-balance-of-power-is-shifting

7f0e2f Zepp-LaRouche, H. (2015, November 13). The Peace Di-

Motaghi, E., & Mahboobeh, S. (2012, October). Soft war vidend of the New Silk Road: Global Reconstruction of

and colorful revolutions of America in developing the Physical Economy. Executive Intelligence Review.

countries. Politics Quarterly: Journal of faculty of law https://larouchepub.com/hzl/2015/4245nov4-hzl-wb-

and political science, 42(3), 207-225. cst.html Zreik, M. & Zhao, C. (2022). Chinese presen-

Phillips, C. (2010, May 31). US hegemony in Middle East ce in the Eastern Mediterranean: evidence from Syria.

is ending | Chris Phillips. The Guardian. https://www. BRIQ Belt & Road Initiative Quarterly, 4(1), 72-89.

theguardian.com/commentisfree/2010/may/31/us-he- Zulfqar, S. & Officer, R. (2018). Competing Interests of

gemony-middle-east-ending Major Powers in the Middle East: The Case Study of

Raimbaud, M. (2017, November 2). Syrie, Iran, Li- Syria and Its Implications for Regional Stability. Jour-

ban, comment la Nouvelle Route de la soie recons- nal of International Affairs, 23 (1), 121-147.

Cite this articleAPA 7
Formatted citationAPA 7

Arbache, Z. A. & Abdullah, B. A. (2023). The conceptual architecture of international relations in the middle east: promoting a new path of economic policy for regional cooperation. BRIQ Belt & Road Initiative Quarterly, 4(2), 6-22.

References20
  1. Abdullah (2019). The source article does not provide a separate full bibliographic entry for this citation.

  2. Abbas (2022). The source article does not provide a separate full bibliographic entry for this citation.

  3. Dugin (2020). The source article does not provide a separate full bibliographic entry for this citation.

  4. Gürcan (2020). The source article does not provide a separate full bibliographic entry for this citation.

  5. Sun & Zhang (2022). The source article does not provide a separate full bibliographic entry for this citation.

  6. BRIQ (2023). The source article does not provide a separate full bibliographic entry for this citation.

  7. CGTN (2020). The source article does not provide a separate full bibliographic entry for this citation.

  8. Cordesman (2020). The source article does not provide a separate full bibliographic entry for this citation.

  9. Jordan Chinese Embassy (2022). The source article does not provide a separate full bibliographic entry for this citation.

  10. Dorsey (2020). The source article does not provide a separate full bibliographic entry for this citation.

  11. Zreik & Zhao (2022). The source article does not provide a separate full bibliographic entry for this citation.

  12. CGTN (2022). The source article does not provide a separate full bibliographic entry for this citation.

  13. Aytekin (2022). The source article does not provide a separate full bibliographic entry for this citation.

  14. Guigue (2020). The source article does not provide a separate full bibliographic entry for this citation.

  15. Gürcan (2019c). The source article does not provide a separate full bibliographic entry for this citation.

  16. Raimbaud (2017). The source article does not provide a separate full bibliographic entry for this citation.

  17. Barnes & Lovatt (2022). The source article does not provide a separate full bibliographic entry for this citation.

  18. Culbreath (2023). The source article does not provide a separate full bibliographic entry for this citation.

  19. Chris (2010). The source article does not provide a separate full bibliographic entry for this citation.

  20. Marxist (2004). The source article does not provide a separate full bibliographic entry for this citation.

Licence and copyright

© BRIQ · CC BY 4.0

Permissions and reprints

briq@briqjournal.com